False Data Stripping Sessions
The FDSing sessions reproduced here are to do with the subject of Scientology and contain jargon from that area. Some of the terminology is explained in brackets, but not all. Just skip it if it is too strange - which goes for the rest of this site too. :)
(Nov 2008 explanatory comments in brackets)
PaulsRobot False Data Stripping Module
PA
20070628
Topic: What is a thetan (Scientology word for spirit)
Well-rested? OK
Well-fed? OK
No drugs/alcohol? OK
No distractions? OK
Enough time? OK
Willing? OK
Else? OK
1:38 pm TITS (This is the session = Start of session)
Doing? OK. Interested, but kinda so-so generally. Maybe
slightly short of sleep (7 1/2 hours). Maybe need to drink
water but too lazy to get up.
OK.
Q1. How the GE (genetic entity - Scn concept) fits in with the
hara/core star & aura (Barbara Brennan concepts) generally
FD? ***GE is a SEPARATE entity that enters body, separate to thetan.***
From? Hubbard, HOM (History of Man, a book)
Where me? vague
1:42 Rub Y
in bed at Stonelands (building), with big lamp, reading HOM
Y
lots of locks on this - later times I've wondered
about this GE entering the body. Actually, there is a larger FD:
***GE is a separate entity that is IN the body***
Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
this ties into an earlier, more basic, FD:
***Hubbard is always right***
1:55
address more basic FD, Rub & Yawn with more basic concept...
OK, the fog has gone, but I'm not sure if this DATUM has blown.
So do FDS procedure on new datum, "Hubbard is always right"
Note this is a later datum hanging up the earlier one.
Source? Personal decision, me
When? 1976
Where u? Desk, Letter Registration section, by window
Where source? N/A (not applicable)
U doing? I was very happy. It was a big stable datum - just assume
Hubbard is right about everything.
Bit foggy about lead-up to this though.
Rub...
2:02
Nothing. It's gone (FD). That's actually a BIG FD. Important
to realize I've reinforced that decision MANY times over
the years, obvious as it is.
Say? Hot stuff. wowsah. Not sure how to write it up
(i.e. how to reprogram the procedure) but wowsah.
2:04 E of S (end of session)
Note: Needs audio commands to exert more control.
***********
(Nov 2008 note: This was a research session to help get the
Robot procedure correct. It was corrected shortly afterwards
and should be fine now)
FDS session 1 July 2007
(Nov 2008 explanatory comments in brackets)
PaulsRobot False Data Stripping Module
PA
20070701
Topic: Scientology!
Well-rested? OK
Well-fed? OK
No drugs/alcohol? OK
No distractions? OK
Enough time? OK
Willing? OK
Else? OK
TITS
7:39pm
(I didn't note original question, maybe is there anything
in Scn I couldn't think with?)
***HOW COME Hubbard is always right?***
in KSW, he "rose above the bank"
Source? me
when? On Hubbard Practising Dc Course around 1978,
Mark McQuade's course room, Dianetics Today course, Saint Hill
Maybe it was at Saint Mary's
u doing? dunno
source doing? dunno
look? dunno
7:43 feeling a bit downtone as not getting the data
Rub
Nothing, no yawns, no increase in tone
ARCH (Arthur Hubbard) HYLBTL (Have You Lived Before This Life,
Hubbard book) is somehow inspired, and is an illustration that
is above normal men's (illustrations)
What's the FD?
Rub x
no, E/S Incident (illegible) is better. HOM. How come he's right while
reading HOM. Is he God?
Source? Me. uh-oh. It's not a datum that I've got.
It's a question. Either rephrase it into a datum, or abandon it.
***LRH rose above the bank, and no-one else can***
Source? Hubbard
HASA Course, while reading KSW
Where? London Org, Basic Courses room
? pack, on my lap
u doing? reding, lack of mass
source doing? on lap
look? tatty
7:56
Rub Y Y he's just full of shit!
true data = layers of Scn onion
Y blown!
Good realization re true data = onion layers article
Recheck Q
no, still yawning Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
yawns still coming off on LRH's infallibility
Y Y Y
8:00pm Y x
8:03 FD blown
Should change instructions to include if bogged,
going back and checking you did each step right.
Say? GOOD
8:03 E of S
FDS session 30 June 2007
(Nov 2008 explanatory comments in brackets)
PaulsRobot False Data Stripping Module
PA
20070630
Topic: Scientology! - LOL (ironic to FDS Scientology)
Well-rested? OK
Well-fed? OK
No drugs/alcohol? OK
No distractions? OK
Enough time? OK
Willing? OK
Else? OK
TITS
8:57pm
(I didn't note what question prompted this answer)
Time frames
FD? ***Universe is 4 quadrillion years old***
Source? Hubbard
When? When I saw the OT3 pack around 1980
Where? Courseroom at the AO (advanced organization)
W? Pack, desk in front of me
U doing? Reading the pack
Pack doing? N/A
Look? Handwritten
E/S? (earlier similar)
HOM (book History of Man), 76 trillion years
Where FD from? Hubbard, HOM
When? Reading in bed at Stonelands (about 1973)
Where? same
u doing? reading in bed
source doing? just lying there
look? white pages, black print
E/S? no
Rub
9:05 It blew just after spotting this as the E/S
9:06 (no yawns)
Recheck question re topic of Scientology, maybe
is there anything in this subject I couldn't
think with?
Body thetans as NO other source in the world talks
about them, and so many people say Hubbard has it wrong.
Barbara Brennan says nothing aboiut them.
FD? ***BTs exist, in profusion***
Where from? LRH
When? About 1980
Where? OT3 course room AO
Source? Pack, in front of me. Mark Jefford (supervisor)
was there too, smoking
u doing? studying
source doing? just lying there. actually, I was sitting
on the toilet reading the pack. I got the idea when reading
about the 36 days and getting packaged.
Look? authoritative
E/S? CBR. Reinforced it. (This is more basic incident, although
not earlier in time)
Rub
9:12 Y Y Y Y Y Y
not just CBR but all those 1000s of "OTs" who validated it"
Y Y Y Y
--charge is coming off LATER LOCKS, like being at DM&A
(employer in 2003) and thinking of "OTs" like Janet Lonon
going along with the flow when she's really a sensible lady.
And Ted Wells too, and he's a SMART guy.
Y
9:20 Y Y Alan C Walter too!
IMPORTANT!! Rub takes off locks of others later in time validating
the earlier FD by their agreement with it.
Y Y Y NOTs material, *something* must be getting audited on these levels
9:23 Y
It's blown. Good stuff. No more yawns coming off, and I discharged the
last of the locks - keyed out.
Say? No. Hot stuff, but need to get it right before I release it.
(i.e. get the Robot procedure right before I put it online)
9:27 E of S
Paul
FDS session 28 June 2007
(Nov 2008 explanatory comments in brackets)
PaulsRobot False Data Stripping Module
PA
20070628b (2nd session today)
Topic: Metering (using an E-meter in Scientology)
Well-rested? OK
Well-fed? OK
No drugs/alcohol? OK
No distractions? OK
Enough time? OK
Willing? OK
Else? OK
TITS
9:25 am
3b. Can't apply? Stuff about Clear Reads, Male + Female.
I KNOW it's BS, but still got an answer on it.
Y
FD is ***Hubbard's meter stuff is true***
Source? Rufus Price! Y
When? 1976
Where u? Letter Registration section
Where src? at his desk
9:28 Rub Y Y
something about Trumbull Jackson, Y
saying re Peggy Billitch he saw what Hubbard was saying, people
checked out clear and had to read with that TA
Y Y Y
that one (FD) is flat, blown, but there's more basic one(s)
re metering
Y
more basic? yes, but dunno what
Rub YY
9:33
something about Gibby Niehus - Y - and his Stage 4 needle that no-one
can do anything about his case
9:35 dunno what FD is
Rub
9:36 Y
something about Gibby is CLEAR, 1st goal clear or something, but
can't be handled
I have a misunderstanding on what a first goal clear is
How's datum now? (Hubbard's meter data is true)
too vague re 3 and 2 (Male and female clear reads), not true,
unknown re all the other stuff.
OK. Continue FDSing on metering.
How come Hubbard got all that data re HOM, but others didn't?
FD? ***Lots of research cases confirmed the data***
Source? Me
When? 1978
Where u? Letter Reg section at my desk
u doing? Dictating a letter and thinking about HOM (book)
How look? N/A
Rub
9:46 no yawns, it's blown.
Gonna end off
Say? Good stuff. Need to tidy up the procedure to run more control
as it is too easy to Q & A (get distracted off the straight and narrow).
9:47 E of S
Condition? OK
(Nov 2008 comment: bit sloppy in the middle! But note how the Rub & Yawn opened up my perception of the events.)