PaulsRobot

The FDSing sessions reproduced here are to do with the subject of Scientology and contain jargon from that area. Some of the terminology is explained in brackets, but not all. Just skip it if it is too strange - which goes for the rest of this site too. :)

(Nov 2008 explanatory comments in brackets)

PaulsRobot False Data Stripping Module

PA

20070628

Topic: What is a thetan (Scientology word for spirit)

Well-rested? OK
Well-fed? OK
No drugs/alcohol? OK
No distractions? OK
Enough time? OK
Willing? OK
Else? OK

1:38 pm TITS (This is the session = Start of session)

Doing? OK. Interested, but kinda so-so generally. Maybe
slightly short of sleep (7 1/2 hours). Maybe need to drink
water but too lazy to get up.

OK.

Q1. How the GE (genetic entity - Scn concept) fits in with the
hara/core star & aura (Barbara Brennan concepts) generally

FD? ***GE is a SEPARATE entity that enters body, separate to thetan.***

From? Hubbard, HOM (History of Man, a book)

Where me? vague

1:42 Rub Y
in bed at Stonelands (building), with big lamp, reading HOM
Y
lots of locks on this - later times I've wondered
about this GE entering the body. Actually, there is a larger FD:

***GE is a separate entity that is IN the body***

Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

this ties into an earlier, more basic, FD:
***Hubbard is always right***

1:55
address more basic FD, Rub & Yawn with more basic concept...

OK, the fog has gone, but I'm not sure if this DATUM has blown.
So do FDS procedure on new datum, "Hubbard is always right"

Note this is a later datum hanging up the earlier one.

Source? Personal decision, me

When? 1976

Where u? Desk, Letter Registration section, by window

Where source? N/A (not applicable)

U doing? I was very happy. It was a big stable datum - just assume
Hubbard is right about everything.

Bit foggy about lead-up to this though.

Rub...

2:02

Nothing. It's gone (FD). That's actually a BIG FD. Important
to realize I've reinforced that decision MANY times over
the years, obvious as it is.

Say? Hot stuff. wowsah. Not sure how to write it up
(i.e. how to reprogram the procedure) but wowsah.
2:04 E of S (end of session)

Note: Needs audio commands to exert more control.

***********

(Nov 2008 note: This was a research session to help get the
Robot procedure correct. It was corrected shortly afterwards
and should be fine now)

PaulsRobot NotTooShabbyPower Module

PA

20080501

Topic: TBD (To be determined: whatever I fancy
from the full list after session start)

Well-rested? OK
Well-fed? OK
No drugs/alcohol? OK
No distractions? OK
Enough time? OK
Willing? OK
Else? OK

9:28 pm TITS

Topic: Love All/Love None

None: Y (no-one loving me)
All: Y (everyone loving me)
None: Y (better change wording to 'no love')
All: Y
N: Y
A: Y 'bountiful love'
N: Y A:Y
N:Y no-one wants my love - rejecting it - i.e. being able
to have my love accepted doesn't work. Thank God for family.

A:Y N:Y A:Y
N:X A:Y
N:Y A:Y N: x it's getting harder to get this lower-scale
concept
A: x (Feeling good, calm, expansive etc.) Time to end off.
Good stuff.

9:42 EOS

Condition? Good. As above.

These are session notes, and won't make much sense without being
familiar with the procedure. I've added a few explanatory notes, but
can't explain everything here -- PA 12 Oct 2008

PaulsRobot DIPOLES Module

PA

2008-05-19

Topic: TBD (To be determined)

Well-rested? OK
Well-fed? OK
No drugs/alcohol? OK
No distractions? OK
Enough time? OK
Willing? OK
Else? OK

9:51pm late...whoopsie...
TITS (=This Is The Session, i.e start of session)

B/D/H? A good wife! (=What would you most like to be/do/have in life?)
opposite? Be alone

-ve Y +Y -Y +Y (embracing the negative and positive poles/opposites; Y = yawn)
-Y +Y note that the +ve stuff I'm picturing
so far has not included sex as part of it AT ALL.
That's VERY interesting.

9:55
-ve Y +Y -Y +Y
-Y +Y -Y +Y
-Y +Y -Y it's looking like the two poles are sort of
fusing together as one--hard to separate out the two now.

+Y - kinda out of the body now, time to end off.

Say? First time I got the idea of the fusion - it's
happened before and this time I remembered the idea from
someone writing about it as some sort of end point but I
didn't believe it.

Also I wasn't expecting this as a pair to come up but it ran
nicely and is actually important considering how much it
actually derails my life! Analytically I don't think it's
important, but that isn't really the point, is it?
This procedure is VALUABLE.

10:08pm EOS